REIMAGINING INCARCERATION: ASSESSING THE APPLICABILITY OF SCANDINAVIAN CORRECTIONAL PRINCIPLES IN INDIA’S CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

Authors

  • Dr. Vijay Saigal Associate Professor, Department of Law, University of Jammu, India
  • Dr. Manmeet Kour Assistant Professor, CMH College of Legal Studies, Jammu, India
  • Oshin Bakshi PhD Research Scholar, Department of Law, University of Jammu, India
  • Mini Gupta PhD Research Scholar, Department of Law, University of Jammu, India
  • Pooja Jamwal PhD Research Scholar, Department of Law, University of Jammu, India
  • Sneha Slathia PhD Research Scholar, Department of Law, University of Jammu, India

Keywords:

Prison System, Rehabilitation, Constitutional Values, Human Rights, etc.

Abstract

The evolution of penal systems worldwide reflects a gradual shift from punitive approaches to more rehabilitative and restorative models of justice. Among these, Scandinavian correctional systems—particularly those of Norway, Sweden, and Finland—have gained international recognition for their emphasis on human dignity, normalisation, and reintegration, fostering hope for meaningful change and inspiring confidence in reform. This results in comparatively low recidivism rates. In contrast, India’s prison system continues to grapple with structural and systemic challenges, including overcrowding, inadequate infrastructure, and a predominance of undertrial detainees, rooted in a largely punitive and colonial legacy.

This paper evaluates how Scandinavian practices-focused on rehabilitation and prisoner welfare-can be practically adapted within India's socio-legal realities, proposing specific policy measures for incremental reform.

The study argues that while direct transplantation of the Scandinavian model into India may be impractical due to differences in scale, resources, and socio-cultural context, its core principles—particularly those relating to dignity, rehabilitation, and reintegration—offer valuable guidance for reform. Emphasising these principles can motivate stakeholders to pursue meaningful change. By proposing a context-sensitive and incremental approach, the paper advocates for a hybrid correctional framework that aligns with constitutional values and contemporary human rights standards.

Downloads

Published

08-06-2026

Issue

Section

Articles